@dblbd Does (((-P))):=0?
H/T @InfiniteSynths @mmhare @topherleigh
-
-
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... Agreed, of course, that the problem of zero-denotation is then left open. ... -
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... Right now it looks like a sacrifice worth making to render unity (explicitly) unthinkable. -
@dblbd@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh So (post-nullotation) zero cannot be (internally) stratified? -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh Not sure what to think. Intriguing that the economical notation captures the entire ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... transfinite set of the Naturals, with the sole exceptions of zero, and one. ... -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh ... Is it really tolerable to introduce new signs to mop up that spillage? (Dunno.) -
@dblbd@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh But interesting problem considering the value of TX is in large part its parsimony -
@mmhare@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh Total stab-in-the-dark hunch -- just one more carefully-selected sign ... - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh (Just in case this is in any way unclear, "'0'" is course xenotational, with a value of 2.) .. -
@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@mmhare@topherleigh ... So the binary sequence, with natural exponents (1, 2, 3 ...), xenotates 0, 00, 000 ... -
@dblbd@lutlopl @InfiniteSynths@topherleigh Isn't 0, 00, 00 just the harmonics (*2, *4, *16, etc.)?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.