A state could try to charge Trump. However, I suspect Trump’s primary lawyer, Bill Barr, would direct the DOJ to make a modified “supremacy clause” challenge, arguing that it would be unwieldy/unconstitutional to allow states to prosecute a sitting president.https://twitter.com/dollymad1812/status/1224125520830324737 …
-
-
Problem is, the way to challenge it is to criminally charge the president. But Barr won’t allow that, so . . .
-
I figure Barr is in this deep, yet with his CIA background, I'd expect, unlike others (Rudy & the gang), he's devious enough to have stayed clean in this and at some point Barr will turn on them all to CYA. After all as he says "no one lives forever." Thoughts?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The problem is that it’s just a departmental policy; what would a challenge even look like, who would have standing, and what would a remedy look like? Ultimately we’re talking about prosecutorial discretion.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
They have jurisdiction rights under 10A & states rights.
Why does an OLC memo that isn’t even a law protect him from State & city charges