So, I have pretty thick skin when it comes to online harassment, but something has been really bothering me.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gaywonk
(1/4) Thanks again for taking the time to share all of this information with us. We take allegations of harassment very seriously–we know this is important and impacts a lot of people.
2,077 replies 194 retweets 3,899 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
(2/4) Our teams spent the last few days conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged to us, and while we found language that was clearly hurtful, the videos as posted don’t violate our policies. We’ve included more info below to explain this decision:
2,357 replies 275 retweets 5,462 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
(3/4) As an open platform, it’s crucial for us to allow everyone–from creators to journalists to late-night TV hosts–to express their opinions w/in the scope of our policies. Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site.
1,263 replies 382 retweets 5,328 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
(4/4) Even if a video remains on our site, it doesn’t mean we endorse/support that viewpoint. There are other aspects of the channel that we’re still evaluating– we’ll be in touch with any further updates.
2,757 replies 177 retweets 3,817 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization. We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies. More here:https://yt.be/help/xLtT
4,286 replies 221 retweets 2,433 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @gaywonk
He still has a platform. He broke the YouTube Partnership program’s community guidelines, so can’t make money on THEIR platform any longer. But his right to FREE SPEECH is intact. So HE should find one that will welcome & pay for the views he expresses. Simple
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Which is FINE, so long as we treat YouTube now as a publisher/curator, and not simply a platform. There are huge legal implications in the line that YouTube is treading right now. The whole “it’s their company” argument only works if YouTube takes the publisher stance.
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes
Can't have your cake and eat it too.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
M