fight me!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'll say the incremental advance in computational power since 1990 arguably exceeds the arXiv
-
Good point! But arXiv transformed every line of inquiry, even those that don’t depend on computation.
-
Although I wonder if your real point here is that physics has pretty much sucked since 1990 :-O
-
haha not my point!! But you could in principle argue that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You mean any discovery other than Tai’s method, I assume. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/17/2/152 … https://math.berkeley.edu/~ehallman/math1B/TaisMethod.pdf …
-
Hahaha. I have no idea what you are talking about!
-
OMG I just looked at that.
-
You’re welcome? Every time I think about complaining about editorial standards, I remember this paper and realize it can be worse. A lot worse.
-
There is also a discussion parthttp://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/17/10/1225.2 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe AdS/CFT? (Obviously not a big impact on _every_ physicist)
-
Good idea! But it might be a purely mathematical result. We don’t live in this world model.
-
True. Let’s have this discussion again in 100 years
-
You might have to invent immortality first!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dark energy vs. the arXiv
-
I’ll take arXiv and even give you odds. BTW there’s a great story to write here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
False, tater tatchos have been inspiring physicists for decades and also I heard they were the inspiration behind arxiv
-
Okay that’s an attack I can’t fend off!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Open source software
-
Or python alone maybe!
-
Guido - the guiding hand of physics since 1991.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.