Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
Evidently, conditional probabilities are hard. These prediction markets are not worth trusting, especially for low probabilities or precise estimates. (via
@HowieLempel) Also, the Yang number is far less egregious than Hillary at... 6%?!? cc:@superforecaster,@PTetlockpic.twitter.com/dx5ho65SsY
-
Not sure that the recommendations here are the best ones - sick people should try to stay home, not just wear masks - but this was well done.
#Fight_The_Virus#Wuhan#Song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIGMLTQj5y4 … (via@ABSAOffice#Biosafety mailing list) -
@MarionKoopmans shared last night's latest China CDC update - http://www.chinacdc.cn/yyrdgz/202001/P020200128523354919292.pdf … , with a corrected Epi curve, below. The text, via Google translate, says this is for Mainland China, as of 24:00 on *January 27*. Per@alexandraphelan, blue is suspected, red is confirmed.pic.twitter.com/Vd9c7CGVK8
-
Seems like a good time to mention a preprint I wrote about the dynamics of how worst-case infectious diseases are slowed and stopped by public heath and population reaction as the disease spreads. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/401018v1 … There's even a toy
#RShiny model on@github to play with!pic.twitter.com/xIWpO0DHXT
-
Heres' some much less wild speculation, from my paper in Health Security on uncertainties in estimating the probability of pandemics: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/hs.2018.0039 … And here is a preprint with a model explaining those dynamics more clearly: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/401018v1 …pic.twitter.com/WbYsRvQRw0
-
Unsurprisingly / unfortunately, all the best recipes I've found are the Hebrew ones:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-yNIhbjt2Y …
-
"...decisions are usually defined by their inputs." Yes, that's what "Decision Quality" and similar approaches to decision analysis consider. They can evaluate the inputs to improve the decision processes. Professor Ronald Howard discusses this here: http://web.stanford.edu/class/cee115/wiki/uploads/Main/Schedule/DAPracticeAndPromise.pdf …pic.twitter.com/LKFdZ68PmI
-
Side point - Steven mentions OODA loops, and says that Boyd was talking about how fighter pilots make decisions. But Boyd, who had been a pilot, understood OODA loops as a far more general tool. I made this point here: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2489.html …pic.twitter.com/u6VTBzCFut
Prikaži ovu nit -
Steven has his standard diagram for how the process works, but I like one I made for my dissertation more. https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD408.html … (Perhaps I'm biased.) RDM says not to get stuck on agreement on the analysis, and start from criteria selection and alternative generation instead.pic.twitter.com/LMtnRtaiLc
Prikaži ovu nit -
Now, I'm in the middle of presenting my work on superforecasting the long term future. cc:
@superforecaster Note: Instead of trying to tweet right now, I pre-scheduled this tweet. Since there's no way to thread scheduled tweets, I'll just provide my outline.pic.twitter.com/D6Q4RT2uHg
Prikaži ovu nit -
He's now talking about the difficulty of incentives with scoring rules, and using Prelec's approach - https://science.sciencemag.org/content/306/5695/462 … - applied to longer-term forecasts (which are unknown for now) rather than PRelec's application to subjective data (which is never known.)pic.twitter.com/3yiK7fbJSQ
Prikaži ovu nit -
Conditioning on non-extinction matters, as does not discussing time scales. And looking at your data, the multi-modal distribution is also very interesting;pic.twitter.com/pAxxNzgQBv
-
Interesting to compare
@robinhanson's survey results of his followers to a weighted US pop. sample from@Google Survey which was far more negative about the long term future. Negative Outlook Robin sample vs. representative US sample- 10 Years: 35% vs 36% 100 Years: 25% vs 39%pic.twitter.com/PTC4lja1Dn
-
The selection bias here seems significant, as usual when you run these twitter polls. In this case, I'm interested in how much. I'm going to re-run this as a google survey - 250 people, and I'll update once I have the data.pic.twitter.com/f2RsvgpOEJ
-
Interesting point on institutions and how they enforce norms, from an old post by
@vgr musing about "structural asymmetries."pic.twitter.com/CgTYJmyv7Z
-
Side note: the "ABCs of Math" board-book from this series, by
@csferrie, is easily my favorite book to read to the kids for their bed-time story. (And yes, it gets requested occasionally.)pic.twitter.com/ESYCdHsDdM
Prikaži ovu nit -
The "ABCs of Math" board-book from this series is awesome, though.pic.twitter.com/UMU6Odb4EI
-
-
Interesting. Regarding actual revolutions, here's the recent data, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/inequality-and-regime-change-democratic-transitions-and-the-stability-of-democratic-rule/C39AAF4CF274445555FF41F7CC896AE3 … analyzed by Krause and
@StephanHaggard. The data seems to show that there is some link between relative inequality and distributive revolutions, even without absolute poverty.pic.twitter.com/LXfDdWup9i
-
Maybe the
@CDCgov's select agent program web site *shouldn't* show people without proper safety gear playing with (pretend) dangerous pathogens? https://www.selectagents.gov I know the web designers aren't the#Biosafety experts, but still.pic.twitter.com/IAoh60LF0i
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.