This is the sort of approach that is routinely dismissed by NIH study sessions as "a fishing expedition." The thing about fishing expeditions is that they result in the procurement of fish - maybe not the fish you expected, but fish nonetheless.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Why so wrong to say “I know where to look but I don’t know what I’m going to find. Here is how I’ll do it. I’m open to being surprised by my results” Most scientists I think operate like that in reality but then feel forced to make seem like they knew the answer b4 doing exp.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I love the smell of
#bayesinthemorningHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
And the social sciences are now increasingly infected by this kind of thinking. Questions that aren’t of latter form are dismissed as “descriptive”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.