I am trying to see your point here. Basics math would tell that if we have 800,000 / 394 = 2030 cases for each judge. So if they work a 80 x 2 = 160 hours per month they could see at least 1920 people carrying over 110 cases per judge which is 43,340 in total. Problem where?
There are currently over 800,000 pending immigration cases. There are currently 394 immigration judges. There is absolutely no way due-process can be practiced in each one of these cases considering there is no right to council. Read below for morehttps://www.splcenter.org/20190625/attorney-generals-judges-how-us-immigration-courts-became-deportation-tool …
-
-
-
Your math says 5 minutes per case. That's not due process. That's introductions, followed by a ruling.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The beginning.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Looking forward to your support of due process during Red Flag hearings, hypocrite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like the rational thing would be to reduce the number of immigration cases.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like we just need to close the doors until we have the ability to control things on our terms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*counsel - there is no right to counsel. U r right. Our work is difficult and made more difficult by the day with changing rules. As one IJ said - these are death penalty cases in a traffic court setting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Things have got top change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.