Or defending yourself from multiple humans hunting you. Which there are hundreds of examples recently give in overturning of California’s unconstitutional magazine ban.
-
-
-
Name two.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, it’s not. They are handy at the range for more up-time while practicing. I understand your perspective, but places try to avoid generalities that can be skewed by it.
-
Then they should be available only at ranges and not for public sale. Problem solved.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, I’m pretty sure that isn’t it at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. I don’t hunt humans. I don’t like spending my time at the range reloading magazines. I’d rather shoot steel targets in a controlled environment. Hell, I even like shooting paper targets. But hunting humans? Nope. Not what my weapon is made for, nor why I own it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Helloooo? Zombies!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
5. break-ins and assaults of the elderly. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. My magazines have never killed anyone. They just mean I have to reload less often.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.