How best to cover mass shootings: Show only names and faces of the victims. Give no noteriety at all to the shooter, whatsoever. Pretty simple actually.
Agree to -Not show any mass shooters face after they’ve been caught -And not say their name more than once in any article following the shooters capture. Or Face a PR shit storm that no crisis management team can handle & a boycott of your advertisers.pic.twitter.com/2U51O6nHEl
-
-
-
Well stated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lol, watch out,
@USATODAY - David Hogg is going to tell everyone about your news articles, which will lead to people reading them, which will lead to your advertisers getting more views! You'd better quake in fear!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
“We will continue to discuss how best to cover....”? I’m sorry but survivors and the families of victims are repeatedly telling the media the best way to do that? Their voices should be the loudest in this conversation, people need to stop speaking over them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That strategy is about personal idealogical emotions, not public protection. It's not appropriate if the goal is public protection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MR Hogg will you ever consider running in 2020
-
Maybe he should seek counseling at a real institution and the get a real education. He sends out a lot of bad information.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ooooh, get ‘em, David!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.