But isn't that what you're saying, David? Aren't you asking people with more guns– the U.S. government– to stop gun attacks by using their guns to disarm the civilian population? You would say no– using their laws. But how do they enforce it? A guy with a gun.
Imagine saying the only way to stop shark attacks is with more sharks.
-
-
-
i'm comfortable saying that the government is more qualified to have guns than private citizens
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Classic misdirection. Create an obviously illogical scenario and assert it's an equal comparison to the one you oppose. If someone believes the first makes no sense, they should believe the second must not as well.
-
Normally I don’t agree with Packer fans, usually out of spite because I’ve had to deal with Favre, followed immediately by Rodgers.. But your tweet is spot on.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
If a country seriously needs armed guards in churches, that's a sign that it has failed as a society.
-
It shows that Americans have been taught they live in a false sense of security. That it could never happen to them. Bad people have always existed. We’ve been told we have no right to defend against them, govt will protect you. That’s a lie & always has been. Arm yourselves.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well, what if we just put up "No Sharks Allowed" signs on the beach? Then the Sharks would just swim away....
-
Statics show 98% of shark attacks happen in shark free zones
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.