We're using empirical evidence and meticulous data gathering to promote public safety.
That's not a standard that anyone has ever held the so called 'tough on drug' policies to.
Read more about my first year in office in my interview with @BBCWorld.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55372462 …
The non-prosecution strategy made it easier + cheaper to get fentanyl which is very deadly causing 2 deaths/day. The tough policies did not eliminate drug use and have their own problems but now 2/day die in SF - count the bodies https://www.ktvu.com/news/most-people-dying-indoors-as-overdoses-surge-in-san-francisco-data-shows … https://archive.is/kEs4f pic.twitter.com/PlBRoalMfG
-
-
listen to someone who knows @MyTwolffamily https://twitter.com/MyTwolffamily/status/1336381412610469888 … fentanyl changed things it requires a rethink of the non-prosecution idea because so deadly. you can't deny 1) 2 day/dying and 2) ease of access is way up - if you don't live here come to the TL and look around
-
remember it is 2/day dying and 10 narcan saves/day...https://twitter.com/SFPDTenderloin/status/1345091540125847553 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You keep saying this but you’re not providing any evidence to back this up. Drug overdoses have been on the rise in San Francisco since before Boudin was sworn into office as well. How do you explain that if it’s his policies supposedly causing this increase?
-
Only 1 year into
@chesaboudin so right now there is anecdotal evidence it'll take longer to prove it. We know the cost of maintaining the policy (2 die + 10 narcan saves / day) how long until you support a test of something different? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.