It’s a nice example of how the prevailing views are empiricist, and therefore expect mental/brain events to primarily depend on external stimuli, at least at a low level. And, when that is not the case, it is presumed to be a sort of noisy error.
There is no such thing as raw sensory data. It's interpretation, and error correction, all the way down.https://twitter.com/computingnature/status/1142510839087423489 …
0:32
-
-
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This also assumes that these neurons are somehow exclusively used for processing what we call visual stimuli
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
When you see the same thing twice in a row, neural network has already made adaptations in handling that particular data more effciently. It is only logical it is very different result the next time. If it weren't there would be no adaptation and optimization.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Aren't the Jungian Archetypes, Kantian Categories, Platonic Ideas, Schopenhaueren Prototypes all constant behind the raw sensory data of neuronal firing patterns
-
Those are all imaginary. We can't communicate well enough to confirm that they are constant.
- Još 12 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Perception is always subjective and changing. This is the subject/object epistemic split in action.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Kantianism
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What Would Galen [Strawson] Say?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.