Scripting News: Scientific American and Bora. http://bit.ly/180WvK8
-
-
Replying to @davewiner
.
@davewiner re SciAm/Bora: Discussion never occurred btwn inability to keep prof/personal boundaries and cross-over to intended harassment.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramblemuse
@ramblemuse -- I wonder if you could post this as a comment on my blog? i don't understand what you're saying and I want to! :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ramblemuse
@ramblemuse -- thank you. a very important point.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@ramblemuse Workplace harassment law, seems impact relevant; intent not so much http://www2.ucsc.edu/title9-sh/intent.htm … http://hr.unm.edu/training/preventing-sexual-harassment/intent-vs-impact.php …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lucialiljegren
@lucialiljegren@davewiner Good point. One can both accept and yet regret no outcome w/o damage and chaos to many.#empathy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramblemuse
@ramblemuse@davewiner Yes. Regret SciAm didn't reduce BoraZ responsibilities get him therapy in 2012. Could have reduced damage and chaos!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lucialiljegren
@lucialiljegren@ramblemuse -- what about chaos? How is the blogging community doing?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
.
@davewiner@lucialiljegren I think@marynmck has set out the latest in searching for a way forward. http://wrd.cm/16nWgib1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ramblemuse @lucialiljegren @marynmck -- thanks for the link, I just read the whole post and posted it to my linkblog.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.