@sapinker @MichaelBarger1 -- great piece -- i've had the same exact thought, we're going backwards.
-
-
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@sapinker@MichaelBarger1 seems in line with the law in he UK: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country#United_Kingdom …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @migueldeicaza
@migueldeicaza@sapinker@MichaelBarger1 -- we can have both free speech and safety.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@sapinker@MichaelBarger1 to me, as valid as this: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Health_Cigarette_Smoking_Act …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @migueldeicaza
@migueldeicaza -- miguel, i've been gradually learning that our values are not the same. i'm sure you're wrong about this, from experience.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@migueldeicaza There's a difference between free speech and mass marketing with big dollars paying for it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matthewlmcclure
@matthewlmcclure@migueldeicaza -- if you go down that path you won't have any free speech. on the net we're pretty close to that already.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@migueldeicaza What about limiting the money spent by any particular speaker on distributing his speech?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matthewlmcclure
@matthewlmcclure@migueldeicaza -- I don't see what that has to do with this thread Matt.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner Maybe I misunderstood@migueldeicaza's point wrt banning cigarette advertising.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@matthewlmcclure @migueldeicaza -- then just take me off the cc's on this. thanks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.