Wow, arrant distortion over a well-known part of public interest fundraising. MT @davewiner: Fortune: http://5ek.r2.ly/
-
-
Replying to @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars -- would you say they have a conflict of interest representing users re the NSA privacy issues?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner cy pres settlements are vetted by all parties, very infrequent, and not solicited; I don't think it says anything abt anything.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars -- why didn't EPIC get a share of the settlement? a valid question, imho, raised by the Fortune piece.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner valid question, but presented in a very misleading and dishonest way. The class and the court had occasion to add them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars -- I really was just asking a question, one that was also raised in the article. do you know I'm a Berkman alum?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner I do! I saw you come across the DMLP feed. I found the article very off-putting, even though the question is a good one.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andy_sellars
@andy_sellars -- cool, I got confused and thought you were saying I was being dishonest, you were talking about the article. ;-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner oh no no! Sorry to make that impression. :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@andy_sellars -- it's all cool. ;-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.