If Rolling Stone is not allowed to run a picture of the bomber on its cover, what else is not allowed? Can his picture appear on a website?
-
-
@davewiner Meant that they defend their position from a journalistic point and while free to do so it’s poor taste to publish him on cover.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner I agree with so many others that a more compelling story and one that wouldn’t be in poor taste would be covering the victims.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.