@davewiner Not a matter of can or can not. Rather, a case of should or should not. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner There are any number of different/better ways they could have designed that cover so that Jahar didn't look like a rock star. -
@jim_reedy 100% agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@davewiner Citing journalistic integrity for putting him on the cover is just utter bullshit. It’s very poor taste. -
@christophr -- i don't understand. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@HAUTEINHABIT -- you didn't answer the question.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner What do you mean by "allowed"? It's not censored, many people and some store chains reacted negatively to it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner you're either missing the point or purposely changing the issue. By law they can print almost anything.The issue is human decencyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner Yes -- but only after a buzzcut and some Photoshopped zits.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@davewiner Come on. It's the context of the Rolling Stone cover that's so offensive. I hate it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.