@davewiner I still think river.js could exist as a standard independent from use case as output from a collection of feeds
-
-
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner ok, its the output of a collection - but as json format of rss that is separate issue & means rss can be xml OR JSON1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daveg
@davewiner to put it another way - you could have jrss buttons that were as useful as the rss 'xml' ones, if Javascript is your thing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner why not? Twitter's taking place of RSS readers for many people, & for programatic access to content Javascript is replacing xml2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner ha. Precisely because you are mr rss and so it could stick.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner but in the end you prevailed. But also as you've pointed out there is a bigger threat to this now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@daveg -- http://techcrunch.com/2007/05/23/100-million-payday-for-feedburner-this-deal-is-confirmed/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.