I think this is a rare mis-step by @Sulliview -- a harmless Twitter wager is that big a deal? http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/under-attack-nate-silver-picks-the-wrong-defense/ …
-
-
Replying to @mathewi
@mathewi@sulliview I agree. She doesn't seem to understand that the bet is over a statistical model, not who is going to win1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @R
@R@mathewi@Sulliview -- funny -- I think she's right. You have to stay out of he heads of trolls. Silver is way above Scarborough.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@r@sulliview: that is a fair point -- perhaps it is stooping. but that wasn't the objection.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mathewi
@mathewi@R@Sulliview -- I actually think that *was* her objection. that the aloofness of the NYT is functional. Keeps reporters focused.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner@r@sulliview: perhaps -- although I think a little less aloofness wouldn't be such a bad idea1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davewiner
@davewiner: I do get what you mean, Dave -- and I think you have a point. Never feed the trolls :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.