@daveweigel But, but... I thought it was all about letting the people decide???
Jeff Flake on Garland (on MTP), just straight giving the game away: "If we lose the election then we ought to approve him quickly."
-
-
-
@alvysingertwitt@daveweigel They'll say something like *Democrats* decided, the court needs 9 justices, blah, blah, blah...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@daveweigel If Rs lose Senate,@BarackObama withdraws Garland, and when new Congress sworn in, appoints himself.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@daveweigel But if we win the election, then Donald Trump will select a much better Supreme Court nominee. -
@RawlsRorty@daveweigel he'll choose the best Supreme Court judge we've ever seen! It will be phenomenal, terrific. (LOL!) - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@daveweigel Spin will be, "Well, the election was a repudiation of Donald Trump, not a referendum on the Court."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@daveweigel Obama should give them until October to confirm otherwise he'll withdraw the nomination.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@daveweigel@Kyle_Feldscher which is actually "the Biden rule" (after the elections) -
@edgeoforever@daveweigel@Kyle_Feldscher There is no "Biden Rule" - never happened that way. Another myth of the loons on the right
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@daveweigel But what happened the principle of letting the people decide?!? Could it be that it's a total crock of shit!? (clutches pearls)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.