Woof. Okay, I have some thoughts.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/opinion/sunday/science-climate-change.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimesscience …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
The basic premise of this lengthy piece is that the rapidity of many climate change processes and impacts has shocked -- shocked! -- many scientists, and that their failure to predict well has helped lead us to our current predicament of fucked-ness. But. BUT.pic.twitter.com/r3dGQ2IFMJ
Prikaži ovu nit -
The piece seems to take as a given that all the estimates of climate change's pace were wrong until recently. But they weren't! Here, look at this graphic they include:pic.twitter.com/VYFOUDBZay
Prikaži ovu nit -
But was the consensus from the 60s --> 80s really that it would take "centures or millenniums" for impacts to arrive? Nope! Here's what the intro to the landmark 1979 National Research Council report had to say: "A wait-and-see policy may mean waiting until it is too late."
Prikaži ovu nit -
Or how about the 1983 EPA report -- the Reagan EPA! Not exactly enviro radicals! -- that essentially predicted the same amount/timing of warming predicted today: potentially 2 degrees C by 2050. (See this thread on that report from earlier this year: https://twitter.com/davelevitan/status/1100141281332940802 …)
Prikaži ovu nit -
"Substantial increases in global warming may occur sooner than most of us would like to believe," wrote scientists in 1983. "Our findings call for an expeditious response."
Prikaži ovu nit -
But also! The NYT piece upends its own argument with the examples it itself cites! 1993 was 26 years ago! How does this mean that scientists were caught by surprise by like the last two years of extreme weather or something??pic.twitter.com/laVWlOHQVM
Prikaži ovu nit -
Or this one! 2002 was still a while ago. Scientists may have used relatively staid language in IPCC reports but that is not the same thing as being WRONG about impending catastrophe!pic.twitter.com/1u6rP4C2iJ
Prikaži ovu nit -
The public's delays in getting up to speed are somehow the SCIENTISTS' fault?? (Let alone that these data have nothing to do with public understanding of RAPID climate change specifically.) Where has this writer BEEN?? I am using so many capitals and exclamation points!!pic.twitter.com/sbT8qVZDx9
Prikaži ovu nit -
Then it goes through some of the updated and yes-very-scary estimates. It is not a fucking SCANDAL that scientists like, do some science and learn more stuff as we go. YES sea level rise estimates have gotten more dire, and so on, but this is absurd.
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
-
Scientists did not "lowball" anything. They communicated what they knew, when they knew it, and were not in charge of who built what power plants or the explosion in SUVs or whatever. They did, in fact, offer some fairly dire warnings as far back as the 70s, if not earlier.
Prikaži ovu nit -
That the NYT is publishing long pieces, in 2019, blaming SCIENTISTS for our failures to act, is INSANE. There is no debate about why we didn't act! It wasn't because we thought it might not be that bad! It was because of evil people who wanted more money! I am done yelling now!
Prikaži ovu nit -
Anyway, NYT, hire me to write the piece that refutes all of that one, I'm available.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I should have gone back farther. The 1965 report to LBJ on the "greenhouse effect" had some VERY dire warnings. Like, that the entire Antarctic ice sheet could melt in 400 years. Or that seas could rise 40 feet/century. Or that we could see up to FOUR deg C of warming by 2000.pic.twitter.com/kKgY975pLb
Prikaži ovu nit -
Still trying to imagine the pitch that led to this piece. "I'm arguing that scientists are at fault for the climate crisis, because they didn't warn us that it would get this bad this fast." "Great. I have absolutely no follow-up questions whatsoever. Give me 2500 words."
Prikaži ovu nit -
I know there's a wall between the op-ed pages and the newsroom, but the NYT climate reporters and editors are SO good! Any one of them could have probably seen this and been like "Uh, hang on a sec." I mean, this was from just last year!!! https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html …pic.twitter.com/RXBuKBNYzs
Prikaži ovu nit -
Okay so as a few people have pointed out, the author of this dumbshit NYT op-ed is currently employed by a hedge fund, which is odd but I don't know what to do with that. He has also, however, written some books. About which I have a couple more thoughts.pic.twitter.com/VapgW2aFGT
Prikaži ovu nit -
Specifically, his 2006 book "The Winds of Change: Climate, Weather, and the Destruction of Civilizations," which seems to do a bit of a Guns Germs and Steel thing where he blames previous climatic changes for various civilizations' collapse. Which, fine, whatever.pic.twitter.com/Bd1MJ2GU4e
Prikaži ovu nit -
In this book, toward the end he includes an ENTIRE TIMELINE of scientists calling attention to the possibility of rapid climate change, dating back into the 1950s. 13 years ago he provided the entire refutation of his future op-ed. It's glorious.pic.twitter.com/kM1x6TMAVo
Prikaži ovu nit -
AND. He notes numerous times about policymakers and others IGNORING the warnings from scientists. Again, just the pure opposite of what he published in the Times!pic.twitter.com/666q2O5VKl
Prikaži ovu nit -
It is BAFFLING to me how you can go from this -- policymakers are dumb and should listen to scientists -- to arguing that scientists were way off and are at fault for not sounding the alarm, over the course of 2006-2019. Anyway, he should go read his own book or something.pic.twitter.com/TisgTqvz4o
Prikaži ovu nit -
I know I should leave this alone but this idea of blame for climate change, and some people's apparent need to find someone outside the obvious culprits, is stuck in my head.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Even the non-dumbshit-NYT-op-ed versions of the discussion tend to anonymize it. "Fossil fuel companies" or whatever. But it was actual people who did this shit, and it's frustrating as hell that by and large, NONE of them will face any consequences for it.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Anyway, here's another thing I wrote a few months ago:https://newrepublic.com/article/154649/reformed-climate-deniers-dont-deserve-redemption …
Prikaži ovu nit -
"Blame the scientists for not being capable of puncturing our collective avarice-driven myopia" is the most galaxy-brained shit. Like, "it's my doctor's fault that I didn't undergo chemotherapy" when she told me to but instead I gave a million dollars to the snake oil shaman.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.