@billieeilish help him out, your music publisher shouldn't have done this, It was unnecessary
Still 100% of the revenue is a bit too much in my opinion considering that @roomie like many other creators make a living out of YouTube. And that is one of the main issues, I mean that this companies don't treat creators like individual people, but rather like a product or sth
-
-
Indeed sounds too much, but if it's only about 1 certain video it could have a very high detail background even he doesn't quite see. A.k.a he made a video using copyrighted material to recreate a copyrighted material and he hardly has his own work which skews the percentages.
-
When I say "hardly has his own work" = editing doesn't count. His face & voice is hardly part of it, most are not his own. Similarly cover bands make money from performances & technically nothing from CDs as they own nothing, even less (0) if they don't sing it up themselves.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.