Pat Helland (@PatHelland) says what we've been arguing for with our new systems design: "two-phase commit is the anti-availability protocol"
-
-
Replying to @cmeik
However, I disagree with "sharing writable stuff is a disaster." That's my thesis and all of our work!
@PatHelland1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @cmeik @PatHelland
Sharing isn't the problem where sharing safely can be guaranteed despite the programmer.
@PatHelland needs#ponylang! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darachennis @PatHelland
this is in the context of distribution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmeik @PatHelland
Yep, not worried about pony distribution ( in the works )... Once LASP has a formal proof should be ripe for porting! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darachennis @PatHelland
I'm skeptical that it can be safe, honestly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmeik @PatHelland
Practically safe is good enough IMHO. Academically safe I'll leave to you fine humans! ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
10 pints if you write a formal paper in 140 characters or less #PapersWeLoveToTweet
-
-
Replying to @darachennis @PatHelland
sounds like a challenge for
@TinyToCS1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
With or without references???
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.