@mjpt777 "allocation is cheap" -- Sun/Oracle :D
-
-
Replying to @mjpt777
@mjpt777@jpbempel isn't@giltene stating the opposite here?pic.twitter.com/mj56SrCdFP
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EttoreMaiorana
@EttoreMaiorana Gil is talking generically but hinting strongly that his collector is much better than others ;-)@jpbempel@giltene1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mjpt777
@EttoreMaiorana Also Gil is not mentioning the big issue of washing out the Intel inclusive caches from high allocation.@jpbempel@giltene1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mjpt777
@mjpt777@EttoreMaiorana@jpbempel The "washing out" issue mostly affects cold stuff. LRU makes it much more bearable than people think.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @giltene
@giltene@EttoreMaiorana@jpbempel Allocation is useful but its costs need to be factored in. "Allocation is free" sets a bad example.2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mjpt777
@mjpt777@ettoremaiorana@jpbempel I don’t say allocation is free. I say that it costs what it costs. And that servers *can* do tons of it.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @giltene
@mjpt777@ettoremaiorana@jpbempel I further say that the worst side-effect of allocation is pauses. And that those dominate design choices.1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @giltene
@mjpt777@ettoremaiorana@jpbempel Allocation is cheap when pauses go away. Blame the collector and it’s pauses. Not the allocation rate.3 replies 4 retweets 6 likes
@giltene @mjpt777 @EttoreMaiorana @jpbempel On embedded allocation rate is a real concern, as are pauses...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.