Worth your reading time: A response by Peter Niblett to @clemensv claim that MQTT is not suitable for IoT https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/c565c720-fe84-4f63-873f-607d87787327/entry/mqtt_a_discussion_on_clemens_vasters_post?lang=en …
-
-
Replying to @darachennis
@darachennis@dobermai@clemensv who needs MQTT for local networks? You have AMQP, DDS & 0MQ for that. MQTT should be replaced by MQTT-SN.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nivertech
@nivertech@dobermai@clemensv MQTT-SN or MQTT both fine. Neither would work on an RF network. AMQP, DDS, 0MQ, carrier pigeons, all good too4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nivertech @dobermai @clemensv By not work on RF, I'm implying on devices with no native TCP/IP stack etc..
9:47 AM - 12 Jun 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.