Worth your reading time: A response by Peter Niblett to @clemensv claim that MQTT is not suitable for IoT https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/c565c720-fe84-4f63-873f-607d87787327/entry/mqtt_a_discussion_on_clemens_vasters_post?lang=en …
@nivertech @dobermai @clemensv MQTT-SN or MQTT both fine. Neither would work on an RF network. AMQP, DDS, 0MQ, carrier pigeons, all good too
-
-
@nivertech@dobermai@clemensv By not work on RF, I'm implying on devices with no native TCP/IP stack etc..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@darachennis@nivertech@dobermai If we had an abstract convention with a simple arrays/maps/values structure (like BSON/JSON/AMQP) and ... -
@clemensv@darachennis@dobermai what's wrong with opaque binary payloads?But I'd like to have something like BSON/BERT for headers/metadata - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis@nivertech@dobermai .. rules for how to express system-signifcant headers and payloads on that convention, we could map ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@darachennis@nivertech@dobermai .. that to whatever protocol comes along. We've done that in SB for HTTP/SBMP/AMQP are expanding that now.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.