Worth your reading time: A response by Peter Niblett to @clemensv claim that MQTT is not suitable for IoT https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/c565c720-fe84-4f63-873f-607d87787327/entry/mqtt_a_discussion_on_clemens_vasters_post?lang=en …
-
-
@darachennis What would be a good choice? -
@dobermai This very much depends on context, use case, environment but there's plenty of choice for messaging over the internet... - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis@dobermai@clemensv who needs MQTT for local networks? You have AMQP, DDS & 0MQ for that. MQTT should be replaced by MQTT-SN. -
@nivertech@dobermai@clemensv MQTT-SN or MQTT both fine. Neither would work on an RF network. AMQP, DDS, 0MQ, carrier pigeons, all good too - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.