@darachennis btw, about https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/fa526023-1fe2-4561-ad37-7c3ddf51479f/b15d788ef5db50e2c138cdcd63124078 … EEP-clj / meltdown can handle around 2M events / sec on a single reactor :)
-
-
Replying to @ifesdjeen
@ifesdjeen@darachennis 8-40 M/s? Bare Disruptor with all their advanced false sharing elimination yields ~20M2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michaelklishin
@michaelklishin@darachennis Reactor tests on my machine: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/e2ce0c40-fe93-4622-b495-b1160023a0e2/84a5f85516ac0b2174b4de5fc1deef99 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ifesdjeen
@ifesdjeen@darachennis sure, single digit or low *teen M’s sounds plausible. But the note mentions 8-40M1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michaelklishin
@michaelklishin@ifesdjeen You're comparing tight-loop micro-benchmark in js to a reactor throughput test on the JVM not like for like...2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@michaelklishin @ifesdjeen Heck, even if you could do 40M/sec in process you won't be getting 40M/sec over the wire! :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.