The Google Protocol Buffers guy wrote a 'better' PB called Cap'n Proto http://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/index.html … // Claims 'infinity faster' with no benchmarks
-
-
Replying to @darachennis
@darachennis What would this benchmark measure, exactly? (There are benchmarks, I just don't know how to report them meaningfully...)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KentonVarda
@KentonVarda Fair question. Although synthetic comparative numbers would be good, say vs PB and for the various bindings1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darachennis
@darachennis Well, again, what do you compare? What is there other than encode / decode time, which for Cap'n Proto is zero?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KentonVarda
@darachennis I can measure an example system end-to-end, but that just tells you the performance of the example code, not Cap'n Proto...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@KentonVarda Some measure of perf of CP would be enough. However, a claim of 'infinity faster' than PB needs addressing IMHO.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.