@lhoguin At 150K 140 byte messages per second, the systems I work on are still barely awake... Calling this 'massive scale' is irresponsible
-
-
-
.
@darachennis yes but you try writing that crap with Rails, MySQL, mongoDB .. Now that’s the tough part! - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis That number probably doesn't account for fan out. -
@dehora True, but embarrassingly parallel so yawn... But, Dublin based position https://twitter.com/jobs/positions?jvi=oV9IXfwt,Job …#fuckinDeadlyScaleLike#snark - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis even their peak at 150k per sec didn't seem massive -
@r4vi Yup. If twitter adopt@push_technology diffusion they can upgrade to 6 million a second. Proof: https://github.com/pushtechnology/diffusion-benchmark-suite …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis tweets != messages though? 1 justin b tweet goes to 36MM subscribers - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@darachennis its not the size of your firehose, it's what you do with itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.