@gilesnelson @darachennis How could one build more advanced technology without addressing the frailties of the humans that build it first?
-
-
Replying to @dancres
@dancres@gilesnelson I consider 'advanced technology' that which addresses human frailties directly. The rest is a pile of bollox. :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darachennis
@darachennis@gilesnelson Not sure I was clear: human frailties mean we cannot build something to combat our own frailty.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dancres
@dancres@gilesnelson Prosthetics. Bioengineering... I don't believe we cannot tackle frailties to some extent.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @darachennis
@darachennis@gilesnelson True, unconvinced these frailties are within the extent. Memory, organisation, discipline etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dancres @gilesnelson Perhaps. But advancement requires pushing extents. I evolve by attending to my weaknesses, not bolstering my virtues
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.