I’m glad to see this “hot potato” provision: Facebook can send big deal, urgent questions to the Board for rapid adjudication. I think that’ll be a lot of the Board’s value to FB - but also to the rest of us.pic.twitter.com/LiRXRouIWn
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I’m glad to see this “hot potato” provision: Facebook can send big deal, urgent questions to the Board for rapid adjudication. I think that’ll be a lot of the Board’s value to FB - but also to the rest of us.pic.twitter.com/LiRXRouIWn
Of course that relates to this truth about the Board members: people will be mad at them. And joining the Board is a reputational risk right out of the gate, with members tying their own credibility to that of FB and other Board members. I hope good people get past that and join.pic.twitter.com/E3Z7O4h3CC
This bit intrigued me, because it implies FB is tracking takedown decisions with tags/metadata that allow them to pull “similar” examples, by some definition of similar. Very curious about the details of that, and what transparency possibilities it could make possible.pic.twitter.com/ak10LjW9AC
One question to @evelyndouek: You mention amicus briefs. How do potential amici find out what’s on the docket?
Like I’ve said, in the room, and then twice in articles, it’s clearer and clearer: this is just for externalizing the hard decisions. Lack of time and staffing + stricter bylaws will mean that only the most gung-ho of members will even consider writing up policy recommendations.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.