Shall we go on a journey over space and time? Wellcome Trust has accepted preprints in grant applications since January 2017 https://wellcome.org/news/we-now-accept-preprints-grant-applications … 2/X
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
The NIH encourages investigators to use interim research products, such as preprints, to speed the dissemination and enhance the rigor of their work.”… “Interim research products can be cited anywhere other research products are cited.” https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-17-050.html … (March 2017) 3/X
Näytä tämä ketju -
In an announcement so old it has been archived from 12 June 2017: "In line with the announcement by MRC, BBSRC wishes to remind researchers that preprints are acceptable for citation in research grant and fellowship applications.” https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20201009155703/https://bbsrc.ukri.org/news/policy/2017/170612-n-use-of-preprints-in-bbsrc-funded-research/ … 4/X
Näytä tämä ketju -
That announcement? "MRC are now also actively encouraging researchers to share their pre-peer reviewed manuscripts via established preprint servers. To this end, we are allowing researchers to cite preprints in their grant and fellowship applications". https://www.ukri.org/councils/mrc/guidance-for-applicants/policies-and-guidance-for-researchers/preprints/ … 5/X
Näytä tämä ketju -
The block grant agency in UK: - "to facilitate open research practices, UKRI encourages the use of preprints across the research disciplines that we support. UKRI also reserves the right to ensure the use of preprints in the context of emergencies. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/UKRI-060821-UKRIOpenAccessPolicy-FINAL.pdf … 6/X
Näytä tämä ketju -
BUT THERE'S MORE: In case you think this is cherry picking, here’s a list of funders accepting preprints from USA, Canada, Europe and the UK. https://asapbio.org/funder-policies 7/X
Näytä tämä ketju -
FINALLY the poor rules in the
@arc_gov_au eligibility criteria are one thing. But why are research offices in Australia only NOW crying out about it? Didn't they see the problem when they read the rules? This is a direct result of the lack of national discussion in Australia 8/8Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I think a rant is entirely justified!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
So they never gave an explanation on why they did it? Would also be interesting if it counts as plagiarism if you use data from a preprint and don't cite it since you aren't allowed to cite it.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.