Do they CALL themselves that?
-
-
-
Because that’s WAY sadder than not being able to get a date.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was started by a woman as a more sensitive way of referring to people who desired sex but weren’t able to find partners. It wasn’t until later that it was coöpted by whiny poopbaby MRAs who think they’re entitled to sex but everyone is holding out.
-
Ah, gotcha. Very interesting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's nice of them to advertise themselves as sad lonely little men
-
I don’t see the benefit of labelling themselves in that way AT ALL.
-
Me neither. Perhaps it was ironic at first and then that's been lost in translation. I'm not sure if that's better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Could they actually be asexual, but they refuse to believe more than two sexualities exist, so they had to make up a word of their own? Or are they just sad little boys who think that bad guys get all the fun?
-
It’s a “want but can’t get” situation, whereas aces are “don’t want”.
-
Oh wait, INvoluntary... My bad, I can see why my joke made no sense nowpic.twitter.com/zAAPpXW4uA
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.