I've tried mentioning that I'm doing a simplified analysis in other posts. It's possible that this forestalls some nitpicking, but people often will attack the exact thing I mentioned. I get so much static on https://danluu.com/new-cpu-features/ … from people who haven't read my 2nd sentence
This also maybe doesn't matter as much nowadays (if it ever did) because most of my traffic no longer comes from news aggregators now that my blog has been around for a long time.
-
-
I'm not sure we're considering the same counterfactuals. The stuff you just said seems like an argument in favor of making caveats more noticeable (thus increasing the likelihood of level-2 comments)? I think the thing I'm proposing (being more explicit abt structure) does that?
-
To summarize, the argument (possibly wrong, but IMO plausible): 1. No amount of visibility is sufficient to prevent a flood of nitpicking, not even having the 2nd sentence stating the opposite of the expected nitpick 2. Having stuff in the main body is a distraction 3. boo 280 :(
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.