Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
danluu's profile
Dan Luu
Dan Luu
Dan Luu
@danluu

Tweets

Dan Luu

@danluu

https://patreon.com/danluu 

danluu.com
Joined December 2008

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @danluu

      Yeah sorry about the walk tweet, I think I posted it and then realized that you said somewhere that the actual analysis looked at what happened when different people were at bat.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn @danluu

      FYI, I think I would have nitpicked less if you had prefixed the examples with "these are simplified from analysis The Book, analysis there takes into account many more caveats, please look at their model if you want more detail"

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn @danluu

      I thought at first that you were presenting mostly-original analysis and didn't realize that the actual stats you cite were (it sounds like) taken from a much more detailed model than the one you present

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn @danluu

      Anyway, it's a totally legitimate move to write a completely caveat-free analysis as an example and then be like "please take your nitpicks to the original source, I promise it addresses them" + maybe this would have saved you time defending from nitpicks?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn @danluu

      Oh no, is the appendix new or did I miss it the first time around? If I missed it, that's really embarrassing since it basically addresses the thing about variance :\

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn

      Yeah I haven't edited the post yet :-). I've noticed from talking with folks that pretty much no one reads appendices, so maybe I should label them as something else? Not sure what I should call it.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

      I've tried mentioning that I'm doing a simplified analysis in other posts. It's possible that this forestalls some nitpicking, but people often will attack the exact thing I mentioned. I get so much static on https://danluu.com/new-cpu-features/ … from people who haven't read my 2nd sentence

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

      I really don't like putting disclaimers up front since I don't think of those as "content" and it pushes content further down, and it also doesn't seem to work? The most frequent comment on that CPU post is "this guy doesn't know anything about CPUs, X was around before the 80s"

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @danluu

      Hmm. For me, I think pushing the content down by 1 sentence is a small price to pay for making that content much easier to parse. I read the entire baseball example with "so when is he going to talk about variance/hitter skill?" in the back of my head

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Ben Kuhn‏ @benskuhn 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn @danluu

      Also, what happens if you try to optimize for "people I know are good readers understanding" instead of "minimize Internet static"? I'd worry that the latter is too noisy (hah) for most improvements to be noticeable

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @benskuhn

      I think that this may result in fewer of what you call good readers because of the way so much traffic is driven through news aggregators & social media. I think (?) a lot of people decide what to read based on reading the comments and/or the title and

      8:17 AM - 26 Nov 2017
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          from having spent too much time commenting, I've noticed that a seeming refutation will get upvoted about the same regardless of whether or not it's right, and if someone replies with a seeming counter-refutation, the upvote rate will slow down, again regardless of correcntess

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          People don't seem to actually care about the information in the comment and judge things by how right-sounding the comment is. I think (?) an incorrect refutation that sits at the top of a comment section will cause people to not read the article.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          If I have some anti-nitpick clause about the thing someone is complaining about, on HN, someone will respond that this was addressed in the article, which will become the top response and knock out the comment

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          If it's on reddit, the 2nd level response won't get any traction unless it's humorous and there's no effect, and on slashdot the 2nd level response usually won't happen, and if it does, it will end up +2 vs. a +5, insightful or something

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          Maybe this doesn't actually matter? It's hard to tell. But I think that potential readers sometimes don't read because the top comment is something like "this guy obviously doesn't know anything about CPUs since this idea was first seen in 1973".

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Dan Luu‏ @danluu 26 Nov 2017
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @danluu @benskuhn

          This also maybe doesn't matter as much nowadays (if it ever did) because most of my traffic no longer comes from news aggregators now that my blog has been around for a long time.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. 4 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info