Underappreciated benefit of good hiring filter: you can rely less on known noisy/bad filters like resume keyword match, prestige, gpa, etc.pic.twitter.com/orS2QZvEh2
Show this thread
-
OTOH, I do really enjoy how people hiring for the same team often can't even agree on the sign of bad filters.
Show this thread
A: only hire people with great GPAs. Low GPA = not very smart. B: don't hire people with great GPAs. Best people don't care about GPA.
-
-
A: only hire people from top
s; top = best.
B: don't hire people from top s; hire people who had to work harder to get where they are.Show this thread -
A: only hire people with the right experience. Hit the ground running! B: don't want people with relevant experience. Too set in their ways!
Show this thread -
For some reason, people who argue for these kinds of noisy filters tend to argue for "objectively" filtering for clones of themselves.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Never heard anyone _actually_ refusing to interview a candidate that passes the "classic" filters (high GPA, prestigious uni, worked GOOG)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.