What's positive about giving a role to the less represented vs the most qualified person?
-
When people refer to positive discrimination the unstated and unsupported claim is that the baseline state is no discrimination
However, historically, for cases where we have good data, we can see that the baseline state is not no discrimination.
-
-
In those cases, programs that boost the odds of people who were considered disadvantaged would have decreased discrimination.
-
If we're talking about the Google manifesto, the data is poor and the situation is messy, so it's less clear what's happening.
-
Damore asserts that diversity programs are "positive discrimination", but IMO that's not obvious and a claim like that needs support.
-
Despite the massive amount of ink spilled on the issue, I haven't seen anyone make a compelling empirical argument.
-
This isn't to say that you couldn't make a moral case for what's called positive discrimination. It's just that one seem to be necessary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.