The correct answer is "if you seriously want me to use that, I don't want to work with you,. Good day."
This week in terrible C++ interview questions: how do you explicitly call int's destructor without a compiler error?pic.twitter.com/iTiTeCyq4E
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why would I want that?
-
This is something I don't want to know. Now I know it and can't un-know it.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
My response to the interviewer: "Why would you want to?"
-
Or better still: "Why are you allocating int's on the heap?"
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Very carefully.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any job where such knowledge is even remotely relevant is not for me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I didn't even realize primitive types have destructors. (Though SO points out it's practically necessary for template programming.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"...and then proceed to try and use the destructed object shortly afterwards"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@1101_debian -_- WTF … were they fishing for placement new's counterpart? WHY WOULD YOU ASK THIS?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.