I often hear that tech companies are disproportionately young because the field has grown so much => most qualified people are young. But..
-
-
There seems to be something funny about that data -- do 25% of degreed cs folks (& 33% of young cs folks) really have a masters?
-
I think that's people who get their BS outside of the US and then come here for an MS, which indicates a hole in the BS data...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My impression is that people who can avoid staying "just an engineer" do. It's a lousy proposition.
-
Pays okay, but not as well as "engineer-plus" specialties like data science, growth hacking, etc. Quality of work's okay, but ditto.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There's also the possibility that those who earned BS degrees more recently have more theoretical perspective.
-
I think the truth is the companies are vying for relatively cheap labor. Inexperienced and recently trained is attractive.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
could also be that degree count doesn't necessarily represent the available workforce. I know several folks who retired early.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe people change jobs disproportionately when young, so young or fast-growing co's are disproportionately young?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have to look beyond CS degrees. Lots of chem (me), physics, engg, math PhDs working in HPC and beyond.
-
on a related note, many folks with a PhD in computational chemistry are well-qualified to do machine learning software.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.