Programmers give "soft" sciences static for having unreproducible results, but we're the same! Possibly even worse. http://andrewgelman.com/2016/09/21/what-has-happened-down-here-is-the-winds-have-changed/ …
-
-
-
Gelman has a specific take on CS at the end of this post: http://andrewgelman.com/2016/10/13/30222/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
you got me (and others) curious, which recent ASPLOS result?
-
I might put that into a blog post where I collect a bunch of examples; don't want to call out one paper because this is normal (IMO)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
was this a paper about how GPUs are 1000X faster than CPUs? Because that's the kind of shenanigans I'm used to
-
when your baseline is x87 code, you can stop reading the paper...
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@danluu @spun_off Sounds like you might enjoy this ICSE '16 paper by Rizzi et al.: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884835 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We recently did a "simple" PL speed experiment: took two person years as we drilled into many normally-ignored details...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... A huge effort but only way to be semi-sure of our result. Don't yet know how to make a cookbook version of our method though :/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But until we can make good experimental methods easier to apply, I fear that it's going to be hard to increase the median quality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.