Half of the papers I read that purport to be about production systems are actually about fatally flawed prototypes that never really worked.
-
-
I don't think people will speak up without anonymity. And maybe not even then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danluu @vyodaiken and
I once had someone make the case I could be fired because of comments similar to the ones I've made here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danluu @vyodaiken and
IMO we're v. sensitive to this because we incentivize publishing bogus papers and produce more than our share.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
well, I don't think industry authors are making the overall bogus paper problem any worse, on average
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ok, fair enough, but I think that we should know better. "We" often claim 2x gain when real system is a no-op.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Many of the bogus academic papers I read just dont build out something where you could measure the real effect
-
-
Replying to @danluu @johnregehr and
or they just have no idea what the baseline should be. IMO that's a lot more excusable than what "we" do.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.