We lost candidates due to recruiter screens like this when I was at Google. Not sure why they persist in doing them http://www.gwan.com/blog/20160405.html …
-
-
Plus many people who claim similar experiences. Funny how often "works for me" turns into "couldn't possibly have not worked for anyone".
-
BTW, policy mandated gdocs for phone screens. Code editors like coderpad, stypi, etc., weren't allowed. I wonder if that's changed.
-
On the bright side, at least it's better than the Amazon intake process! https://rajk.me/amazon-interview-experience/ …pic.twitter.com/7feWbU9w86
-
Round 2. In round 3, you join a replication of the Milgram obedience experiment. J/k, R3 is the job; it only looks like a Milgram experimentpic.twitter.com/tAhg6zIPzZ
-
This is what happens when I refer someone to Microsoft without also forwarding them to a specific hiring manager http://moderndescartes.com/essays/my_ml_path …pic.twitter.com/cY0M5cv7Wm
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe they'd be more trusting of it if you phrased it like "Perhaps you're a non-consensus node having partition tolerance issues?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@garybernhardt It's weird in group psychology to believe not having personally experienced a thing means it happens to nobody.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only one that seems implausible to me is the Quicksort one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was used to similar SNAFUs at small startups quite regularly. Never worked somewhere as big as Google, though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.