We lost candidates due to recruiter screens like this when I was at Google. Not sure why they persist in doing them http://www.gwan.com/blog/20160405.html …
-
-
Whenever I hear "we can't lower the bar" I find at least one laughable filter in the process; often the literal opposite of what they want.
-
The HN comments have Google employees who claim it's implausible this ever happened to anyone, along with employee who says it's common.
-
Plus many people who claim similar experiences. Funny how often "works for me" turns into "couldn't possibly have not worked for anyone".
-
BTW, policy mandated gdocs for phone screens. Code editors like coderpad, stypi, etc., weren't allowed. I wonder if that's changed.
-
On the bright side, at least it's better than the Amazon intake process! https://rajk.me/amazon-interview-experience/ …pic.twitter.com/7feWbU9w86
-
Round 2. In round 3, you join a replication of the Milgram obedience experiment. J/k, R3 is the job; it only looks like a Milgram experimentpic.twitter.com/tAhg6zIPzZ
-
This is what happens when I refer someone to Microsoft without also forwarding them to a specific hiring manager http://moderndescartes.com/essays/my_ml_path …pic.twitter.com/cY0M5cv7Wm
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.