"But *hand wave* security! There are errata, you know!" but yeah, never when vendor string is Intel or AMD, apparently? Sigh.
-
-
-
I respect your opinion, but I also respect the cost-effectiveness evaluation of he who get phone calls about 0-day in NaCI
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Everyone I knew in Google Platforms (low-level nerds who know what CPUID is for) thought this was a bug. But chromium still disagrees.
-
... and two years later, a backdoor was discovered in VIA C3 x86 CPUs
https://i.blackhat.com/us-18/Thu-August-9/us-18-Domas-God-Mode-Unlocked-Hardware-Backdoors-In-x86-CPUs-wp.pdf … - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Google doesnt sound too confident here. What does it mean "We work with engineers from Intel and AMD to get additional information"?
-
Like: The CPU's are not documented and insecure by default and you need to work with engineers to understand what's broken?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
not surprised that the justification is security
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.