What if the real reason to want static types wasn't correctness, but tooling?
@davidbalbert @jordanorelli @oskarth It's possible to get those without static types: http://bsumm.net/2012/08/11/steve-yegge-and-grok.html ….
-
-
@davidbalbert@jordanorelli@oskarth But to be fair, it's more work, which is why it's only available through proprietary tools atm. -
@danluu@jordanorelli@oskarth dunno if this is similar or not because I haven't read your link yet, but it's cool:https://vimeo.com/74314050
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.