@danluu The 111% number is correct, but comes from Table 5, not Table 4. See 30-34 & 35-39. Will you correct your post?
There is a gender gap in tech salaries, or, please stop writing articles without reading the studies you're citing. http://danluu.com/gender-gap/
-
-
-
@wagonomics@qz cites the wrong table, not me (although that didn't prevent the author from telling me that I should learn how to read). - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is it too much to expect ppl to be able to read a chart before they insult you? AEA former pres agrees w/me: http://ow.ly/urxxo
@danluu - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@NinjaEconomics@kragen@danluu There's no shame blocking someone for being annoying, though. Right? Subtweeting to me is shameful. -
@lorakolodny@NinjaEconomics@danluu I disagree: people who disagree with me are mostly annoying; blocking them for that would be unworthy. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@danluu Shocked & appalled that@NinjaEconomics is defending her original article that again has large holes in its research. -
@danluu@NinjaEconomics a quick example: the http://dice.com survey referenced doesn't show the # of responses or where they are from
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.