I find the SSC "Too much dark money in almonds" post interesting because it starts from the premise that there obviously isn't too much dark money in almonds, an argument from incredulity, and uses this (and similar) to argue that there isn't too much dark money in politics, but
-
-
I don't mean to pick on SSC in particular, I think that's probably the least wrong "smart generalist" blog out there (I don't include gwern in this category since he seems to stick to topics he has a good understanding of, which limits the range of topics he writes about), but
Show this thread -
it seems very difficult and perhaps impossible to write about a wide variety of new topics all the time without saying a lot of things that are obviously naive or wrong to someone who's familiar with the field being discussed.
Show this thread -
It's become trendy to say that you should have credentials in the field to discuss it. To be clear, I'm not saying that. I think anyone can put in the time and learn about anything, I just don't think that someone can put in the time and learn about everything.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can you identify more of these articles? Might open you to criticism, but it does feel valuable to build an epistemic norm that thoughtful people can share honest opinions while explicitly disclaiming responsibility to engage in detail. It reduces the contagiousness of mistakes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes brainstorming with an expert is the only way to get a well rounded generalistic perspective... Or may be just read alot and create a brain map in ones own way. In generalization, there is always more beneath the surface than is visible to the eye.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.