I think making a general purpose static site generator is non-trivial, but making one with the three features I actually use that runs pandoc to do markdown conversion seems pretty simple, and then I could use a decent markdown implementation, too -- Hugo's is sort of broken :-/.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Last time I wanted to upgrade Hugo I just gave up and put an old binary into the repository
-
That's what I do now
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like writing your own SSG is an important rite of passage so by all means have at it! that said you could move over to
@gatsbyjs, we have a whole team of folks maintaining it to make sure that doesn't happen.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
add me to the "welp, so much for hugo; time for yet another site migration..." camp.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
where is that thread you are refering to here?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I had a very simple site generator in about a hundred lines of Ruby in a Rakefile written a few months ago,but then I overcomplicated it for no good reason and lost motivation on it.
I should probably go back to that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I spent *significant* time building my own publishing toolchain (as seen at http://mr.gy ). I hadn’t had to fiddle with it in the last 4-5 years or so, so that’s good I suppose. In retrospect, I maybe, possibly, would just write plain HTML and skip the system building?
-
“The Making of Geneva: A Portable Document System” https://mr.gy/blog/making-of-geneva.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.