When talking about static types you can't just take the union of all the best features in all type systems. Like if one gives you A but not B and another B but not A, you can't say static typing gives you A and B. You're going to write your code in just one of them!
-
Show this thread
-
The article I'm subtweeting did NOT make this mistake, and was up-front about this limitation. But that article caused internet fights, and the commenters in THOSE made that mistake. (the other big mistake people made was "commenting without reading the essay.")
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @SeanTAllen @hillelogram
FWIW, I think lobsters comments have gotten a lot better since the moderation regime change. IMO there's still a higher fraction of mean-spritited (poster is bad and should feel bad) and entitled (poster should have written it to satisfy my preferences) comments than on HN...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
...but it's improving. OTOH, being less nasty and entitled than HN isn't a super high bar and, IMO, it's not there yet.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.